25 August 2012

Nick's post-contest performance analysis


Nick's post-contest performance analysis

After an important contest, it is important to do a critical review of performance to determine what went right and what went wrong with the goal of improving for the next time, and passing information to other pilots considering contest flying. There are two aspects to review, the glider performance and the pilot performance. Prior to the contest, preparation was very important, and preparation of the glider included proper polishing, a review of all control surface seals, and installation of proper intrumentation, software and loggers. Because of the heat, I asked Christine to make me some light white cloth covers for the PDAs I was using, to keep direct sunlight off the units and minimize overheating problems. I normally fly in 18m configuration and for the pilot preparation, I flew all year in 15m configuration to be "at one" with the glider. I flew in 3 contests and did some record flying.

I knew going into this contest that I would be at a slight disadvantage with the LAK-17a, now an older design, limited to 500 kg all up weight. It is an 18m design with a compromise shortened wing in 15m. Newer gliders are limited to 550 kg in 15m and 600 kg in 18m, and with the strong conditions in Uvalde, a high wing loading is crucial. In 15m class, the contest rules limit the maximum weight to 525 kg, so I was only down 25 kg and with a high aspect ratio, the wing loading deficit was not very large, but was, nonetheless, a deficit.

I had an overheating problem with my main logger early on during the practice days. Although this logger was not in direct sunlight, the ambient 42 C temperature caused it to fail. Everyday, I put an icepack on it an hour before flying and removed it before take-off and had no further failures. Dan Daly had brought his Volkslogger as a spare which I installed as a third unit, just in case. I also had a problem with my mechanical vario where the needle would get stuck on the stop when the thermal strength peaked above 10 knots. I had to vigourously tap on it to free the needle on a regular basis during most flights, a real annoyance that I hadn't prepared for because it never happened before getting to Uvalde. Other than that there were no other issues with instruments, radio or flight software.

At the beginning of the contest it became obvious that I wasn't climbing as well as other pilots and was constantly getting out-climbed. On successive days, I changed the CofG from 75% to 85% to see if I was better able to climb. No change. I tried halfway at 80%. No change. I then tried the other way at 65% but still no real difference. By the middle of the contest, I noticed that in some cases, I could climb just better than the Dianas, at par with the ASW-27s and slightly worse than the Ventus-2s, but in most cases, I was outclimbed by all. I finally figured out that the difference was related to the smoothness of the thermal. In relatively smooth thermals, I could climb as well as others, but in broken and turbulent lift, I fell behind badly. Now that I knew what the problem was, I tried some solutions. First, I tried flying faster in turbulent lift and at higher bank angles. Then I tried with a flap setting of +1 instead of +2 because of the higher speeds, and I also tried reducing the electronic audio from 2 second damping to 3 second damping, to reduce the amount of corrections I was making for centering thermals - perhaps I was falling off the edge of the narrow thermals. All attempts had limited success, and I was frustrated by the issue. By the end of the contest, whenever I encountered a turbulent thermal, I would skip it if I had reasonable height to proceed, and take only the relatively non-turbulent ones, and this resulted in much better average speeds, and a 10th place finish on the last day. Now, is the problem glider or pilot related? The only way to find out is to swap gliders with another pilot and fly in close proximity in turbulent conditions and see what happens...

On glides between lift I also noticed that when the airspeed was 90 knots or less I would end up at the same relative height to other gliders at the next thermal, but at 100 knots plus, I would lose a few hundred feet. The 25 kg deficit was probably the cause, although on the last day I flew against a Ventus-2bx at 120 knots on final glide and lost virtually nothing. But then again, polars for gliders at 120 knots are very close. There is no question that choosing your path between thermals is crucial as I've lost hundreds of feet on gliders 1000' away to the side and have gained the same at other times. Consistently choosing the best path results in significant height recovery and higher average speeds.

I prefer and normally fly by myself in contests but the flaw with that is that you may not find out about a performance problem and therefore cannot address the issue. In a contest with lots of pilots, you can get to fly with other pilots in close proximity for long periods and learn from the experience.


24 August 2012

Team Captain’s  closing notes.

 

Now that we are back home again, but details are still fresh, I should add some thoughts to the blog.
As some of the pilots mentioned, the trip was long indeed and with all the driving around at the contest site we added about 6000 km to the Santa Fe’s odometer.
The contest was well prepared and plenty of US  volunteer staff were at hand to get the job done in an orderly fashion. Some issues always surface last minute, but overall it ran pretty smooth.

The practice week proved that indeed practice is very valuable for pilots, crews and contest personnel.
The Canadian team had its own glitches as our pilots had their own ideas about practice flying.
Some preferred day on/day off, others 2 days flying  and 2 days off etc.
As it turned out, there was always flying during the practice days, resulting in no rest days for the crews,
tiring them out even before the contest started.
Observing the first few practice days,   I came up with a routine for all the crews and this was tested at the one day during the practice week that all pilots were flying.
It worked quite well and was maintained until all suffered from the heat at the field and it was decided that the crews spend the waiting time at our air conditioned motel room.
Scruteneering was as serious as it gets, with the FAA looking at all the glider and pilot’s documentation.
As it turned out this eliminated FAA checks on the grid.

All our pilots were flying their own gliders with familiar equipment, flight computers and back-up loggers. They still experienced glitches with SUA files and outright logger failures.
Jerzy’s  ClearNav failed on the first contest day and his Cambridge back-up did not start until after take-off.  Nick’s EW logger failed.... All this was due to extreme heat and added a lot of stress and distraction, costing valuable points.

As I mentioned earlier in the blog, pilot’s responsibilities have shifted. More attention is required during flying, but technicalities such as reporting start times and turning in flight logs is the Team captain’s responsibility.
Issues with procedures, changes and concerns are dealt with at the team captain’s meetings, which simplifies and shortens the morning general pilot’s meetings.
With all the up-to date available weather info it is also very important to have this passed on to the team pilots.
A good ground station with a tuned antenna that was erected at the Motel 6 resulted in an acceptable range. This worked quite well.
I was able to talk to most pilots up to about 120km out and this proved to be a big help.

On the first contest day heavy T-storms developed on course and I was able to advise the pilots of their locations, helping to avoid slowdowns.
On many contest days I advised on blue holes and cloud situations that the pilots could not observe from their own locations.

We have proven that the Canadians can and will be at the top and it was disappointing that during the closing ceremony no mention was made of the last day when  Jerzy and Dave  finished 1, 2 in the 18M, the best Canada has ever had at any previous WGC’s.  Nick finished  a very respectableble 10th for the day in  15M,
Dave and Jerzy flew together on several occasions, but on the last day it worked quite well, resulting in the top 2 spots in their class.
I am sure that with some more practice in team flying our pilots will be at the podium in 2014.

In closing, I would also like to recognise the volunteer crews. They showed up paying their own way to look after the pilots, relieving the pressure of the pilot’s spouses.
Joe Laposnyik, Dave Springford’s crew. Dan Daly, looking after Jerzy Szemplinski, skilfully updating the team blog and taking care of some team captain matters in my absence when I had to pick up Annemarie in San Antonio.
Sonia Hildesheim, looking after Nick Bonniere in her own quiet but very efficient way.
I am glad that Annemarie was able to join us during the contest and share some of the load.
Her observation from the 1991 contest was very valid...Bloody hot!
As a matter of fact, one of the local politicians admitted that if he  owned both  Texas and hell, he would rent out Texas and live in hell... but the flying is the best in the world!

 

Ed Hollestelle. 

 

 

 

        

 

23 August 2012

Dave's post-contest analysis


To start, I would like to thank Virginia and Joe Laposnyik who suffered through the heat on the grid each day making sure my glider was as clean and ready as it could be before the flight.  Having two dedicated crew was a real asset and saved me from having to over-exert myself and tire before the flights.  I often sat in the car while they were toiling away on the runway and thought - wow - how lucky am I!  I could not have done it without them.

Our Team Captain, Ed Hollestelle and wife Annemarie were also of tremendous help.  Each day Ed would look after all the little details and be on the grid to help us prepare for the flight and offer words of advice and encouragement.  While it was Ed's job to look after us, it was Annemarie's job to look after Ed and both did a super job.

Before the contest, I set a goal for myself to earn at least 90% (usually 900 points) on each flying day.  Doing this would guarantee a good placing.  I missed this goal on 5 of the 13 days, but overall achieved 92 % in the final standings.

The 18 meter class was an extremely competitive class as 90% of the winner's score would have landed you in 21st!  By comparison 90% in 15 meter was 9th.  Jerzy finished at 94% and that 2% made a difference of 8 places!

The biggest take-away for me is to fix what went wrong on the 5 bad days.  On most of these days I started too early because I didn't have the patience to play start gate games.  On some of the days there was a threat of storms coming in, and then they didn't, so those who gambled and started late were able to take advantage of the better conditions.  On my worst day, (day 6, 692 km @117.9 km/hr) I had some bad luck but also became much too conservative at the end.  I think I climbed almost 1000 ft too high in a 1 kt thermal and that 10 minutes cost 8 places and 50 points on the day.  And, that 50 points would have moved me up 3 more places in the end.

Overall, I am quite happy with my result, but of course would be even happier to have done better.

From an administrative perspective, I think we have learned a lot over the last few years.  We had a large contingent of people on the team that allowed for a good distribution of work, in particular, away from the pilots so we could concentrate on task preparations and flying.   We had a very good ground radio and antenna that allowed us to talk from as far as 150 km away, thus allowing Ed to relay weather and tactical information to us while on course. Jerzy and I were able to effectively team fly several days and push each other around the course.

Finally, even though I already thanked Virginia, I need to do it again.  She is an unwavering supporter and worked extremely hard in the hot, humid and dusty conditions to keep both the glider and me in a top performance state.  It really is a huge sacrifice for our spouses to follow us around to these lunatic events :)

See you all in Leszno 2014!

22 August 2012

XG - after 2012 Worlds

We are back at home in Canada after two and half day drive.
Our Uvalde hotel lost email connection in three two days.
I didn't have full access to tasks results and possibility to
analyze opponents traces for last two days, I just used
information from others. I assumed that weather briefing is
accurate .
The weather on the last day of flying wasn't very promising as
high clouds were moving in and just couple short lived Cu's were
popping around.
Before start we had hard time to climb to start altitude as
fast approaching Cirrus from NW didn't work in our favor, I met
with Dave and we started together at the same time.
When we were ready to start most of competitors were on course.
First leg with with low cloud base and fake clouds wasn't good
sign , but deviation made to the North paid off and we had to
thermal just to improve our altitude.
At the end of the first leg, very dark Cumulus clouds under full
Cirrus worked and next leg looked better and better with
beautiful cloud street leading to the next turn area.
Then suddenly our cloud street merged with new cloud street
leading back to Uvalde , flying extra 20 km put us in to perfect
position to make the last turn .

Around 67 km from home I was able to center 10 kt thermal to
which Dave arrived just 1 minute later . Couple turns and I was
on final glide finishing task with average task speed of 150km/h
which gave me win for the day.
It was my second win in this contest, but mistakes in other days
cost me a lot and I finished 8 th after 13 days of flying.
I think it was the best day in history of Canadians flying in
World Championships, two Canadian pilots taking first and
second place of the day.

It was one of the most demanding contests for the pilots and
crews.
Pilots had chance to cool down under cloud base, but crews had to
stay on the ground in full heat till pilots were on the course
and then after couple hours of rest in cool hotel room they had
to work in heat and dust to help returning pilots.
Conditions were very harsh on our gliders and cars as well,
picture shows dusty engine compartment after 3 weeks in Uvalde..
Maria my wife/crew helped me with glider preparation and all
daily tasks. In addition I had comfort of second crew, volunteer
Dan Daly who helped me with glider preparation before and after
flight.
Ed Hollestelle our team manager took care of all administrative
and team related problems in addition he was working hard to
give the pilots current information about weather and position
of other competitors while we were on course.
Thank you All
Jerzy Szemplinski XG

19 August 2012

Nick's day 13.

Nick, ST - Day 13, 18 Aug

Heavy cirrus to the north and over Uvalde and blue sky with CUs 30 km south. After release I climbed to 5000' MSL under a small wisp under the cirrus deck, and seeing some small Cus to the east in the sun, I decided to go have a look. The CU evaporated by the time I got there and I tried another one, same problem, probably just bubbles, and I was now a bit far for my altitude and I headed back to the airport. I was contemplating a relight but found 0.5 kt at 900' AGL. It was hard work to climb out of this hole with full ballast.

I started with a small group of gliders and headed out on the first leg, not finding much lift but progressing slowly. After the first area I was flying with the Belgians and we could see sunshine to the east and slowly headed that way. We eventually got to the sun and conditions improved greatly. Cruise speed increased to 90-100kts and lift under cloudstreets was reliable. I turned in the second area earlier than the Belgians, who decided to continue another 15 km to try to improve their overall speed. I didn't want to chance not getting back to Uvalde with the cirrus moving in and cutting the lift. As it turned out, the way home was paved by a long cloudstreet, slightly off course but worth the detour since the direct way home had few CUs with cirrus overcast. I circled only once in 150 km to gain 1500' in 5 kt thermal. 50 km from home the Belgians had made good speed and caught up to me, but were 1000' lower. So they had gained 30 km, but needed to climb that 1000' and in the end lost what they had gained. We ended up with the same speed. It was good to finish the contest on a good flight worth a 10th place finish.

I'll follow up with lessons learned later.

It's all over

The closing ceremony happened this morning and new World Champions were crowned.

We sat outside in the rain for the closing ceremony.  The weather cooperated for the duration of the contest and held off the rain until all the flying was done. 

According to the CD - we flew over 800,000 km combined this contest and that was enough to get us to the moon and back!

We are packing up and headed for home, so the blog will be quiet until we get home and I'll try to add some closing thoughts when we are home.

Dave's Day 13 - part 2

Well it was a late night last night, so I didn't get a chance to write about the flight.  The weather yesterday had a risk of thunderstorms, as a trough to the north started to pass through the task area, it also spun off a lot of cirrus that moved through the task area in bands.  The launch was delayed while a band moved through the start area and the sniffer reported that he had to move a long way to stay in the lift.

The nice thing about the Uvalde area is once the sun hits the ground, it does not take long to kick off a thermal.  We launched near the back of our class at 1410 and I was able to immediately climb to 5000 and then moved to another cloud and found 6 kts to 6000.  Then the next band of cirrus moved through and we managed to hang in between 5-6.  Our gate opened at 1451 for a 2:15 area task, but it looked grim on course and we were in no position to start.  I made a run west about 10 k back to our start gate where the sun was shining on the ground again and we found about 4 kts that took us up to 7500 in a good start position with a cloud street heading towards the first turn.



As we crossed I-35 that runs south from San Antonio to Laredo, we started to catch up to the cirrus shade, but were still high and were able to stay relatively high as we crossed the weak area.  Just before the turn in the first area, we were down to about 4300 and approaching the sun and found a 6 kt climb back to cloudbase.  At this point there was a great street that ran pretty much on course along the transition from the sun to shade area.  We ran this line into the next turn, then jumped one street west to make a little more distance before heading home.

The run home had another street running about half of the 140 km distance and we were able to run this line and stop for a 5-6 kts and then race home.



We were fortunate to never get really low and never have to struggle with weak lift - we got everything right from start time to track and turning just deep enough to come home 6 minutes overtime giving us a Canadian 1-2 finish on the day - a great way to finish the contest.

18 August 2012

Dave's Day 13

wohoo!


Off to the farewell fiesta, more details later tonight!

Last day; post-briefing and tasks.

Quiet at the tiedowns this morning as the crews took the gliders out of their 'jammies and watered-up, ready for weighing.  Only Ed's cheerful "morning" to each crew...

Internet has been out at the Motel and may be up later today; we'll need it, to advise the team in the most efficient method around the thunderstorm.

Here is a distant iphone shot (so poor quality) of the inspection of the glider which was one in the mid-air yesterday being photo'd as part of the investigation.  No new info available.  Kudos to two members of the German 15m team who aborted their tasks to ensure the pilot who had bailed out was ok, passed coordinates, and stayed overhead for moral support.  Both occurrence pilots were at the briefing, and have been examined by the IGC/WGC doctor - all ok.

Trailers are loosing their wheels and being put into the sea containers for the long trip home... and the tiedown area is bustling a lot less than it was.  There is a feeling of finality; the post-competition party tickets were just handed out.  It would be a bad day to land out...


It will be a large finish gate today due to the Thunderstorm risk - 15km/3000'MSL.  This shortens tasks by 12 km from what the page says.


Weather page 1 of 3.
 Good luck with that one.  2k steps on left, time at bottom.  Iphone in dark theatre.
Dan and Walt got a standing ovation for their concise, thorough, and successful briefings in a very complex environment.  Anyone getting to hear got a thorough understanding of the weather, and unlike many met briefings, what occurred to change what was expected the day before was covered - small changes in temp and moisture make a huge difference here.

Grid's in 30 minutes.


17 August 2012

Nick's day 12.

Nick, ST - Day 12, 17 Aug

It was shaping up to be a good day, but a radio call from the team captain put an end to it. "The 15m task is cancelled. There's been a mid-air. Both pilots are OK. Return to base". It puts things in perspective as I had a glider overtake me twice only a 100' on the side at the same altitude, with the flarm beeping away and pointing backwards. You can't move up, down, right or left, until the glider overtakes and you finally have a visual, or the flarm stops beeping. When in radio contact, it's not a big deal, but with no radio contact, it's not a good situation. With a long cloud street into wind and the next turn perfectly lined up on track it was going to be a great run, and I thought I'd go further for a little while, but I just turned for home. It was good to hear both pilots are OK, and my crew was going to be happy to see me back.

Dave's Day 12

A long 653 km racing task today that the winners completed in 4:08 at 157.8 km/hr.  We started too early today at 14:11 while the others started around 14:21 and then caught us about an hour later. 


It is amazing what difference 10 minutes can make in a start time.  We had trouble finding good climbs and I was down to 3300 ft before the first turn and then ran the second leg between 4-5000 as we headed north into the hill country.  Just before the second turn I finally had a climb that took me to 6000.  As we ran along into the hills, Jerzy was about 800 ft above me and he connected with a thermal that I didn't get at my altitude and he was able to run ahead of me.  We found the thermals very disorganized down low, but once above 6000 they improved.


I rounded the northern most turnpoint and then the legs started to align with the wind and I was able to bump and run along streets.  On the way south, I was able to get ahead of the group who had caught me and by the time I reached the fifth turnpoint to the east, I had caught up with Jerzy again, but was still 1000 ft lower.  The leg to the southern turnpoint was across the wind, so I jumped from street to street and on occasion found myself lower than I would like.  Now that we were out of the hills and the day more developed, the thermals down low were much better and I was able to consistently climb away.

After rounding the last turnpoint the streets aligned well with the leg home.  I stopped once for 2 turns, gained 650 ft and then bumped the rest of the way to the finish.  The final leg today was 148 km in 44 minutes at 201.9 km/hr. 

But, the amazing stat for today is 3.5 minutes cost 10 places on the day, ouch!

15 m task for the day cancelled

Some of the other 15m pilots were involved in rescue/communications overwatch/escort for the damaged glider and in the interests of fairness the task for 15m has been cancelled for the day.  We have recalled Nick through a relay through the Belgian team.  Crew is on the way to the airport.

Tasks for 18m and Open continue.


midair at WGC - Cdns not involved

We have heard reports of a midair at the WGC. One pilot bailed out and is ok; the other recovered back to Uvalde and is ok. 

I believe it was in 15m; Nick, ST, not involved.

More as reliable info develops.

Dan

Post-briefing 17 Aug, and FLARM performance

There has been a lot of interest in FLARM generally, and PowerFLARM in particular.  The ranges that the team are getting, in some cases with very new installations, varies.  Dave is getting 10 miles/16 km with his new antenna and PowerFLARM Brick.  The data feeds into the LX9000, which is useful.

Nick is getting about 7 miles/11 km with his Brick.  Tactical data is on the rectangular FLARM display, and can be displayed on XC Soar, however, you have to go to specific FLARM pages to do this, and you lose some situational awareness as a result; so, he stays on the moving map mode.  He says that better integration of FLARM into XC Soar navigation displays would be a good thing, and expects that in time, it will happen.  One competitor's EuroFLARM is consistently setting off warnings when it shouldn't, probably a settings problem with that person, and this is a bit irritating.

Jerzy had integration problems with the EuroFLARM and his Clearnav; as a result, he's running it stand-alone.  The range he gets - "Enough".

All agree that the contest is much safer with FLARM, and that tactical data - others altitude and climb rate, contest numbers - is useful, particularly on blue days.

 We haven't had much General Aviation traffic, and we're some distance from San Antonio (90 min drive), so airliners do not present the same threat as at SOSA or Gatineau, since the airport is closed from 1130-1530 daily for the launch and pre-start.

Lastly, when qualified as IGC loggers, a lot of extra GPS pucks and wiring of back-up loggers can go away, and this will be great.  What with all the various gizmos, and small panels, less clutter will be a plus.

Dusty.  That's the word for the grid.  The ropes - 97 of them - are laid out on the left side of the grid. As covers come off, one of the wonderful recovery crew (wearing bright orange T-shirts; I see today they have bright green - "The Lime Crew" - play on line crew) comes by and places the end of the rope by the glider.  About 10 mins later, you launch.  Here's a pic of the amount of dust blowing between the time it was placed, and the time the wing dolly comes off, with 2 gliders ahead of you:
 Yup.  A "dust shadow" when you move the rope.  Vis was zero/zero when I tried to drive back down the line after Jerzy's launch... had to stop for a few minutes.  I pity the folks at the back of the grid. 18m is at the front tomorrow, so a little longer task, I expect. We're gridded 13/14.  ST, with 15m, further back.

Tasks and weather.




If the day is slow to develop, a "B" task, which will be a variant of these, except a bit shorter, will be called on the grid.

Outlook for tomorrow - a trough going through Texas, with a 40% chance of rain - which they need.  So, today is more critical than other days, since it may be the final flying day.  It looks, according to Metman Dan, like a typical Uvalde day, which we haven't seen yet...




16 August 2012

Nick's Day 11.

Nick, ST - Day 11, 16 Aug

A late starting day with slowly rising cloudbase is the prediction. 2-3 knots to 5500' in the blue is what I find after release.

I sample lift in a few gaggles, but find nothing much, and gliders are milling around waiting for the gate to open. I eventually climb to 6500' and decide not to delay and start alone. It's 2:45PM, with a 3:45 hour task. I catch up to some earlier starters but I lose them in the haze, and then 5 gliders come from behind. The first two legs are in the blue, but with the promise of clouds on the fourth and fifth leg that I can see far in the haze, I cut the second area short. F1 relays a message form the team captain, that there'll be CUs along highway I35. We get to the CUs near the third area. The gliders are continuing further into the area, but I decide to turn north and extend into the last area where cloudbase should be higher, and lift stronger in the hills. The wind doesn't line up with the track, so it's a zigzag to follow short stretches of cloudstreets and I end up detouring inside the track. Halfway up the leg, I see four gliders converging on the same Cu I'm headed for, and they're a little higher. We continue north, but there are fewer and fewer clouds. At the centre of the area, we get a bit of a climb and it's decision time. Keep going in the blue and hope to find some lift or head for home, and probably come in early?  I decide not to take a chance and conserve the speed I've achieved and head for home. I need to find an extra 3000' or so along the way. A couple of climbs with a group of gliders and it's a straight-forward final glide, and 2 minutes over minimum time. 462 km at 122 km/H.

Dave's Day 11

Today, it was expected that convection would start late and finish somewhat early so we had a relatively short 3:30 area task.  The 18 m class was second on the grid, and our gate opened around 3 pm.  With an expected end of convection before 7 pm, there was not much time to waste before the start.


Unfortunately, we had a bad day today.  Looking at the baro trace shows part of the reason.  Around 1720, we got into a hole and it took a long time to get out of it.  We were running, what looked like, a good line of clouds, but nothing was working.  We wasted many turns trying to find something and took a weak 2.9 knot climb so we could move on.  Fortunately we were not alone as there was a mixed group of 15 and 18 meter gliders as we had a common leg at this point.  Finally, 20 minutes and 40 km later we connected with a 6 kt climb that got us up and running again.



We also wasted time on final glide trying to center a last thermal, but eventaully gave up on it and headed for home on a slim final glide.  Fortunately, there were still a few clouds we could bump on the way in and we were able to stay on glide slope.

As typically happens, the fast guys don't find the holes and that was no exception today as they smoked us.

Comp Day 11 - 16 August. Quiz answer... and task sheets.

Quiz answer:  You can see the Exxon sticker on the... quiz thing if you look closely.  It is intended to be flown from car aerials, "you have a tiger in your tank" - Exxon advert.

Others thought it might be an ambitious yawstring, and other uses were suggested (shame on you all!!!).  We did find a use, though...  thanks to Christine for her sense of humour!

The crews do work hard; here are the 18m primary crews attempting to keep the prodigious dust off their ASG-29's before launch yesterday:


We grid together by class and country, so F1 and XG are together.  ST is usually some distance away...

OX is close by; here is Swiss team captain Willem ambushing Jerzy with "Swiss Karate" on the grid two days ago; Jerzy still went on to win the day...


Finally, a pic of F1's new PowerFLARM antenna fit.  There is a ground plane under the glare shield, and the antenna is fed from the bottom.  Range seems acceptable.


Tasks and weather:



So, a later start to convection; grid at 1245. If the day is even shorter to develop, the "B" task - shorter in all cases - may be called.

15 August 2012

Nick's day 10.

Nick, ST - Day 10, 15 Aug

The weatherman predicts a blue day, but the sky is full of CUs. Mind you they are not working very well. I usually go exploring between release and the start gate opening to figure out what conditions are like and today I find myself back down to release height in sink wondering if I'll be going for a relight. Not a good start.Lift is weak and cloudbase is at 5500'. Our team captain, Ed, is looking at the visual satellite picture and reports that the CUs are localised within a 60 mile radius and it's blue to the south.

Seeing a good cloud alignment for the first turn, and the start of thinning of the clouds, I start early. The first two legs are slow, and just when I hear the Belgiums starting, lift improves and cloudbase has increased to 6500'. Started too early again... I go down the third leg until I see a good cloud street aligned for the fourth leg, but this cloudstreet is short lived and it turns blue with a few wisps. I meet up with some gliders near the fourth turn and get near an 18m gaggle going south too. There's surprisingly good lift in the blue with a few wisps and haze domes to chase. A 6 kt thermal to 8600' allows me to get the last turn and I just need to bump to final glide height on the way home with a tailwind. A 100 km from home, and a few bumps and slowly get onto glide path. Overall a slow day for me, just touching each zone for 386 Km, at 109.5 Km/H.

Dave's Day 10

The weather today was a mix of cu and blue conditions on different parts of the course.  The first three and a half legs were in the cu, then we transitioned into the blue, and then on the final glide back into the cu again.  Jerzy and I flew together for the entire task today and it worked really well with each of us taking the lead at various times throughout the flight.

We had a great final glide, with our last thermal 118 km from the finish line and then a scorching run home with a 20 kt tail wind to give a speed of 199.9 km/hr on the final leg.


We tried to maximize the second and third turn areas as we expected the conditions to be worse going into the east and south turnpoints, and they were - mainly because of the blue. We were able to run cloud streets on the second and third legs and catch up with and then pass the group that left before us.



For our efforts today, WE netted 3rd place - I'm not counting the one point difference!

This moved both Jerzy and me up a couple of places in the overall standings.




15 Aug post-briefing (Comp Day 10); panel pic LAK17bfes

 
 LAK17bfes panel.  PowerFLARM portable on RAM mount. V7 Vario/computer. ASI, mechanical vario, Samsung android phone running one of the many soaring programs.  Second row - Base for the RAM mount, Becker radio, altimeter.  Third row - Colibri II logger, motor/battery controller. On the left canopy rail, looks like a Nano flight recorder (everyone has a back-up).
The LAK 17B has different wings than the -a, same fuselage, and in one of the two flying here, a different horizontal stab/elevator (the other has the older type, and a new one in the trailer - the older went through tech inspection, so it's the one that must be used). There are also new winglets that are taller than the -a's.  Note the narrow tip wheel to reduce drag.  I want a pair of those!  See how the winglets are faired - very different than in other gliders.
The gliders - one going to Vancouver, one to the US (I think New Mexico) - both have the front electric sustainer engines.  Very interesting...  They are always just behind us on the grid - nice guys!

Congratulations to Jerzy on his day win yesterday, at a smokin' average speed of 153.5 kph over 581.7 km (he said he was redline limited on final glide when an energy line headed straight for the field)!  A speed of 148.0 kph would have got you 16th in 18 metre!   15m winning speed was 143.2 kph over 598 km.  Open, 157.0 kph over 663 km... one landout in Open class, a little under 10 km from the finish ring... late to International Night!

Another load of dusty, sweaty clothes go to the cleaner - and will be washed and folded by 4 pm at a buck a pound.  One less thing to think about...

And of course, a big shout-out to the International teams who put on a such a nice spread of their countries' famous snacks and drinks.  Pity the pilots had to leave so early, to rest.  Poor them!

Tasks du jour:



There is a change to Open's start gate, which is normally different than the others (keeps them apart, as the spot trackers show).  The new gate will decrease Open task distance by about eight klicks.

And, a quiz; this was the morning gift on each pilot's place.  It is furry.  It is round.  It is not sticky, happily.  What is it?  Nano flight recorder gives scale...



14 August 2012

Nick's Day 9.

Nick, ST - Day 9, 14 Aug

Another long and challenging day. Few Cus to start and slow at improving. Very few Cus on the first leg, with the first turn under cirrus. It was best to wait a while for the area to fill in.  When I got good height, 7000', in a gaggle I went back to the corner of the start and was on my way at 14:00.

I went along the leg on the upwind side for two reasons: first, the CU alignment seemed better, and a no go zone to the west could prove a problem if you got too close, and of course the wind blows you back on the course line when thermalling.  Went into the turn low as I couldn't find good lift, and found good short streets of clouds on the second leg. The second point was in the blue and I pushed in low, to thermal after the upwind turn. This leg and the next proved quite frustrating, as I was caught up and passed by 4 groups of gliders. The cruise speed was between 100 to 110 kts. after the third point, we headed up into the hills and it looked like the density of CU diminished the further north you went. There were still enough CUs marking good lift to the fourth turn, but after that there were long stretches of blue. It was best to get high! Because of the sun angle, I could see quite a few flashes of wings on the horizon ahead. I didn't really want to go downwind of the track, but that's where the few CUs were. I took climbs to cloudbase, which was now over 9000' because the turnpoint was under heavy cirrus, with no clouds. After the turn, It looked bleak under the cirrus. I went for some dark grey clouds which proved useless. There was one cloud way to the south west, but I thought it might be too close to the zone. I saw a wisp to the east and turned 90 degrees for it. I got 1000' out of it and headed towards the sun to the south east. I saw a Diana ahead below, but there wasn't much there, so I moved a bit to the side and found some reasonable lift to 7500', almost good enough for final glide. I found another 500' and was home free. It turns out the wind had diminished significantly and I didn't need that 500' and should have skipped it! 598 km at 122km/H.

XG Day 9 -Canadian Day

Today we had very fast task, any waste of time was very expensive.
I was able to start late and pass early starters and win a day,
finishing first with the highest speed of 153.5 km/h.
Jerzy XG

Dave's Day 9

Today we had a 581 km racing task.  Our task was changed on the grid because the initial task ran too far south and would have been under the influence of a deck of high cloud, and then ran too far north where we would have been in an area that received about 1.5 in of rain yesterday.


We had a short leg east, then went south and then up north a little ways into the hill country.  There was about 25% sky coverage with cu and some nice streeting.  Going into the second turnpoint I caught up with a group who had started a few minutes earlier and then stayed with them for the rest of the flight.  At times we went out own ways, but eventually met up again further along the course.

One mistake I made that cost me about 2 minutes - and 10 places on the day - was on the westbound leg to the north.  I was out ahead of the gaggle a little ways and elected to go right of course over the town of Kerrville where I expected a good climb.  It wasn't there, but the group that went left of course, found a good climb and then made it to the last turnpoint 1500 ft higher and 30 secs earlier.


The barograph trace shows the streeting action during the flight with lots of little bumps and only a few climbs.  It took 13 climbs to cover the 581 km distance and I averaged 5.4 kt for 12 % of the flight.   I had three nice long runs 134 km, 100 km and 91 km.

The final glide was spectacular, as a cloud street ran from just south of the last turn all the way back to Uvalde.  I climbed with the gaggle in a great thermal (7.2 kt) to 8600 ft and then ran home at 110-140 kts all the way, covering the final 83 km in 25 minutes !

My speed today was 148.3 km/hr - good for 13th on the day and only 2 minutes behind 3rd!

Post-briefing 14 August and panel pic o' the day

 Today's panel pic is OX - Antares 18S, flown by Werner Danz (owned by Willem Langelaan).  Winter ASI, SAGE vario, EuroFLARM with a glareshield compass peeking out from on top, Clearnav, CAI 302, Winter Altimeter, Becker radio, and a transponder at the bottom. Nice leather grey/blue handgrip...
 Since panel space is at a premium, there is a back-up logger on the headrest... attachment perhaps a bit flimsy for my taste, given its prime location about 2 inches from the pilot's brain (time for "the universal adapter?").  Your mileage may vary... Note also, the SPOT tracker on the parachute.

There are a lot of SPOTs out there - all the Canadian team use them - and many are attached to chutes, so your position (rather than the glider) is known. Having done SAR, having a better position to start from is a great thing. Low data rate, but low battery draw too, all for a hunded bucks or so.

Tomorrow - panel pic of the LAK 17bfes (front electric sustainer), and its winglet detail that is interesting to me.  It's tough to get to very many other gliders, and crews understandably don't want a bunch of people nosing around their cockpits in the busy time between gridding and launch - particularly with a camera wielded by an opposing crewman!

I'm trying to get pics of PowerFLARM antenna installations to help those wrestling with placement (my Brick goes in to my SZD-55 when I get home - here as a team spare right now).  You've seen Nick's, and I will get another pic of Dave's new antenna (FLARM) - he's buried the ADS B/Transponder antenna under the glareshield (FLARM is 10 milliwatts, transponders 175-250 watt transmit, so a bit more forgiving in receive).  Both are Bricks.

Here are the tasks of the day:





There was a change on the grid in 18m to a B task:

Pretty well the same distance, but doesn't run down the edge of restricted airspace, and stays out of the wettest part of the hill country.

 We were across from the Open class today; here are 3, and you can see how the wings, full of water, droop.  An ASW 22, modified, Concordia, and a Nimbus 4T...  Probably the worst picture of the century.